Wednesday, October 27, 2010

I turned out just fine! (Ignore those tumors)


So I had the pleasure this morning of dragging all three kids to school thirty minutes early to meet with the class moms to plan an upcoming celebration in the classroom. I was already in a great mood, after last night's email exchange with the teacher, during which I asked if my children were welcome to attend since who the hell is babysitting at eight in the morning. After being told they could sit quietly in the hall and read, I promptly asked would she prefer if my three year-old hang from the light fixtures or pry the fire extinguisher off the wall first. He was then, of course, welcomed into the classroom. Again, I was asking, in a much calmer and less public way than I did last year, why do these schools behave as if you have only one child? Regardless, all my offspring were there, safe and accounted for, as I sat through another school meeting.

The focus of this meeting a was the food, as this is a pretty significant holiday celebration. It will be a mutli-course meal that the parents are responsible for supplying, and bringing to the school at 9:00 sharp, so that their children can eat only the bread and dessert. Seeing the variety of items needed, and adding in the fact that all items must be store bought according to New Jersey regulations concerning allergies, the mothers and I decided it might be best if we purchased the items and asked the parents to pay. It's a win-win scenario. No parent has to experience lying in bed, remembering they have to bring forty mini-muffins to school the next day, and rushing out in their pajamas, and we, as the organizers, are not handed three snack-sized bags of blueberry muffins the next morning as a result. So the decision made, I spent an hour at the local grocery pricing out the items at the prepared foods counter and bakery - you all know how I feel about supermarket bakery cake. I thought using their food services, rather than, say a catering company, would keep costs down.

Then I get an email. From a mother who came into the meeting five minutes before it ended. She wants to buy all the stuff at the local organic supermarket to avoid high fructose corn syrup, hydrogenated oils and trans fats, and to have as much of the produce be as organic as possible. Sigh. This is just what we need to drive the costs up, of food the kids won't even eat, so the parents can bitch when we ask them to throw us a few bucks, allowing us to do them the favor of planning a hassle-free party for their kids. Those snack bags of muffins were starting to look pretty good.

Now, don't get me wrong. I buy mostly organic produce, and gave the kids only organic milk for quite a while - or until our milk bill was almost as much as our cable bill. I buy Pirate Booty and Annie's macaroni and cheese and Horizon organic chocolate milk boxes. I have drunk the organic-no-trans-fats-or-high-fructose-corn-syrup Kool-Aid. Just not a gallon of it.

I understand there are parents who are extremely dedicated to their children's nutritional habits, and I admire you greatly. If you made you kids' baby food, you are my hero. I also understand that good nutrition is one of the cornerstones to a healthy life, and those habits need to be formed in childhood. What I do not understand, in this particular instance, is the fear that one meal not entirely made of organic ingredients, or dare I say it, loaded with preservatives, is going to give your kid cancer down the road or prevent him from going to Harvard. A bag of Doritos once in a while is not such a bad thing, is it?

Look at our parents generation. Raised on "space aged" foods. The more multi-syllabic words on that label, the better it is. It's made by SCIENCE, Son! TV dinners, Campbell's soup, Twinkies, Jello, it's a miracle they didn't grow two heads. And aren't there, like, a billion baby boomers that are going to suck the life out of Social Security before we can get to it? My own grandmother, who, granted, may have been naturally preserved by years of hard living, is almost one hundred.

So take it easy on yourselves once in a while nutritional Superheroes. You efforts will most likely ensure your kid has higher SAT scores than mine. Just cut yourself some slack and don't make yourself, or the rest of us who are not as tireless and dedicated as you are, crazy two or three times a year. Besides, nothing makes you see how much better eating well makes you feel than making yourself sick on Sno Balls* at the holiday party.

*OK, even I, who love all processed sweets, wouldn't eat these things, since I can feel the preservatives coursing through my veins after the first bite.

Thursday, October 21, 2010

And the winner is...

…the shorter hair*.

I know, I know, technically, the winner in terms of votes was the longer hair (19-4), but…I just couldn’t do it.

For a while I had been persuaded that the longer hair was the way to go, with all the votes in favor of it, and after stopping in at the hair salon (MAAAAAAARY!) and getting much positive feedback. Then a reader posted this comment:

"you look older with the wavy hair...like a mom trying to be young and hip..."

And that, in a nutshell, was my underlying fear with the longer hair.

So thank you, Anonymous. I feel like you and I were Lucy Liu and Samantha in the the Coulda, Woulda, Shoulda episode of Sex and the City:

Samantha: “You want truth? Your last Golden Globe dress was a disaster.”
Lucy: “EXACTLY!!! Thank you! I had all these queens* telling me it was fierce.”

It is such a fine line in today’s youth-obsessed culture that it is easy to fall on the wrong side with the best of intentions. So I had to go with the hair that made me feel like me, and not a mom who is desperately hanging onto her youth – leggings and all.

*Sorry, no picture, but I have a big pimple and as today is laundry day, I am wearing a really ill-fitting U2 t-shirt. - which H also happens to think is sexy. So I guess, if you put it together, if he had his way, I’d be look like a Hooters waitress.
**And, I don’t think of any of you as queens (OK, maybe you, Brian)

Sunday, October 17, 2010

Cast Your Vote!!!


No, it's not Election Day, but I need your input on some thing equally important as picking the leader of the free world - my hair.

The summer is over, and this, like every summer, I spent the entire three months of June, July and August with my hair in a bun or ponytail. Because of this, I save myself some money and do not cut my hair for twelve weeks. The start of the school year was also particularly hectic and I had no time for a cut, so I have added four more weeks onto that and now...I have some serious friggin' hair. With the change in season, I am now faced with temperatures that allow me to wear my locks down without sweating like Saint Bernard in Vegas, and I am faced with a dilemma. Do I cut it or keep it?

In years past, the choice was obvious, since the straight, That Girl flip I do requires my hair be kept at a certain length, otherwise the flip is less flippy and it looks sort of flat. I have had this hair style in various lengths for quite a while, kind of since Jennifer Aniston brought I back with "The Rachel". But this summer, faced with an event where a pony was not appropriate, at the encouragement of my hairdresser, I tried wearing my hair wavy (pictured above). This involved a piece of equipment I had relegated to the Halls of Hair Regret years ago - the curling iron. I had feared wearing my hair wavy for years, after treading too closely to the Carrot Top 'fro category in college, but being a regular at my local hair salon with my monthly color appointments has its privileges, other than them shouting out, "MARY!!!", a la Norm from Cheers upon my arrival, and my hairdresser lent me her professional-grade, large barrel iron, and gave me a wavy-hair lesson.

I have sported this look a few times, and gotten compliments on it, but my fear is, people are commenting because it is just too much damn hair to ignore, much like if one met Crystal Gayle at a cocktail party. H, is no help at all. He LOVES long hair. But I don't truly feel I can trust his opinion since I kind of get the feeling this length of hair is his idea of porn and he is in favor of it for personal reasons. I would not walk around waering a French maid costume for the same reasons.

So who could I turn to, but you, my dear readers, for an un-biased opinion? What I need from you is to compare my profile picture and the one above and choose your favorite. Voting is open between now and Wednesday night, as I have a color and cut appointment Thursday morning. Now, I'm not saying I will necessarily let my decision be absolutely made by all of you, but I will strongly take your opinions into consideration. And, trust me , I know how ridiculous this sounds, but I thought it might be fun,

There are some rules:

If I see you on a regular basis - family members and locals - you are not allowed to vote, since this would cause awkwardness if you are in favor of the style I do not choose. This includes you - Dad, Big T, Mick, SG, BK, LB and all brothers in-law. K, I'd exclude you, but you fall under the Required Brutal Honesty of Sisterhood clause.

You may not identify yourself.If you choose to comment, Blogger offers you the opyion of anonymity. Please utilize this feature since, again, I don't want you to think my hair is ugly if I'm meeting you for coffee.

Please do not make derogatory comments about the style you so not choose. Accentuate the positive and only comment on what you like. Since I do not want to know you think the style I wind up choosing makes my head look like a helmet.

So let your voice be heard! Cast your vote in the poll created by my nerd, I mean husband. I will post Thursday afternoon about the choice I have made since I know you are all so deeply invested. Not.

*I was home alone when I got htis brainstorm. Please enjoy the picture I took of myself in the bathroom mirror.




The Rachel or the Crystal Gayle?

Friday, October 15, 2010

And so it begins...

Tuesday was school picture day, and as I have written before, my children's appearance recieves a level of attention never heard of in my day. This year was no different than the last, with Little Man waking with terrible rooster-head and #2 picking out some weird outfit combo. But the big difference? My oldest and I had our first fight over the issue of appearance. I never thought this would happen.

When I gave birth to the first of my two girls, I started out with all the information I needed to raise a healthy woman courtesy of Free to Be You and Me, Naomi Wolf's The Beauty Myth and a lot of Wonder Woman. I was never going to let her think her appearance was important. It's what's on the inside that matters. Fast forward eight years and I am standing in the kitchen gesticulating wildly with a hairbrush, telling my oldest there is no way in hell she's wearing her hair down and with a middle part for school pictures. In my defense, she looks really, really awful with her hair parted in the middle. Right now her face is too big for the equally awful, purple, Hannah Montana eyeglasses I let her choose last year, and her teeth are a little too big for her mouth. Save the hate mail, she is still beautiful to me, and I think, to other people who didn't labor for sixteen hours to give birth to her, but she is definitely going through her first awkward phase. So letting her brush her beautiful hair flat against either side of her head, when moving the part just an inch to the left sets off her eyes so nicely and you can see all the highlights still in it from the summer, was not going to help.

And now I sound like a pageant mom.

So what is a mother to do? My own mother and I never argued about hair, or makeup, or fashion. She was not at all confident in that department herself , so she just let me do my own thing, and I have the truly awful school photos as evidence of how well that went*. It's so cliched, thinking about a mother claiming she knows what looks best on her daughter while said offspring rolls her eyes. Not that mine did that. I'd smack them right out of her head.

Two days later, still wondering if I did the right thing, strong-arming her into wearing her hair my way, we went shopping for new glasses to replace the riduculous ones she has now, and I was faced with another such dilemma. After trying on thirty pairs pretty similar to the ones she has, #1 puts on a pair of wireless glasses with tiny flowers on the arm and it was if the light of heaven shone down on her face and there was a halo of bluebirds flying around her head. Even the ophthalmologist said, "Oh my." And what did my eldest do? Shrugged her shoulders and took them off!!! For the next ten minutes, I begged, cajoled and almost bribed her, into selecting those frames. I even had the eye doctor in cahoots, having him tell her the putrid Wizards of Waverly Place glasses she was contemplating were too small for her. Finally, after trying on every other pair in the place she said, "I like those." Whew.

I am worried dear readers. I am worried about a morning a few years down the road when #1 comes downstairs, dressed for school, in some outfit so indescribably awful I think she's joking. While inappropriateness will not be tolerated, what does a mother do about terrible fashion sense? I know, I know. I have to let her do her own thing and make her own mistakes, but having made some major ones myself (stirrup pants come to mind), I die knowing all the trouble I could save her.

But that, I suppose is parenting. You have to hope they have learned enough from you to make good choices (with how seldom she sees my hair down, I think I have shorted her on this lesson), and other than stopping them from when they are truly about to do damage to themselves (she will never wear stirrup pants), let them make their own decisions and let them suffer the consequences. I will take the lessons from this week and bite my tongue until it's practically severed. It's her choice what she wears - even if it looks like she was blind when she put it on.

I draw the line at bad shoes though. I have my standards.

*I'd share with you, but the scanner is broken. 1989? Rugby shirt with popped-collar and hoop earrings. Middle part.

Monday, October 11, 2010

Dear Leggings,

Dear Leggings,

Hi. Hope you're Monday is going well. I think our date went pretty well yesterday. Did you watch mad Men last night? OK, this is going to be awkward no mater how much I sugarcoat it, so just let me say it. I'm writing because I don't want you to get the wrong idea.

The fact that you and I are even in a relationship again is astounding. The last time I saw you in 1991, you were creme colored, I was carrying twenty extra pounds, and CDs were just catching on. Looking back at pictures of those days, it is plain to see you did me wrong. Sure, I wasn't exactly helping you out with coordinating creme flats and not-at-all-ass-obscuring tunic, but your comfort deluded me into thinking I actually looked good. Pfft. So I dumped you and your capri-length flowered incarnation as well, into the Goodwill bin.

Fast-forward eighteen years and we run into each other at Target. I glared at you from my spot in the checkout line, behind the woman buying ten bottles of detergent and a track suit, wondering how you dared show your face in the fashion world again. Hadn't women everywhere learned their lesson? I walked out that day laughing the laugh of the righteous. Until that winter came. Fed up with the daily hunt for white, not creme, tights that did not have a hole in them or weren't tied in eighty-five knots around a pair of jeans in the dryer, and the complaints when a favorite dress could not be worn on gym day since feet ensconced in tights "feel weird" inside sneakers, I hesitantly let you back into my life. My kids loved you and that made it seem like you had changed. After all, it wasn't my thighs you were encasing. Leave that to the children and gazelle-limbed teenagers.

And then...

This fall you were everywhere. Of course in the magazines I am getting too long in the tooth to read, like Glamour, but then you crept your way into the fashion section of O Magazine, which is usually the realm of figure-flattering slacks and cowl-necked sweaters, silencing my cries of "But I'm too old!" My knee-high riding boots, it seems, were to act as your wing man, whispering to me from their cardboard coffin under the bed, that getting back together with you would provide me with another option, other than my skinny jeans, when wearing them, since mercifully boots of their ilk were in again this season. A sartorial menage-a-trois if you will.

So last week we met for a cheap date at Old Navy. I'm sorry we couldn't get together at J Crew, but for what I consider to be a fling, I'm not spending any big cash. And that is exactly my point, Leggings. We are just having a fling, a cold-weather romance. I even thought it would be a one night stand, once I received H's mocking appraisal of my purple tunic and gray leggings ensemble, but his approving looks have bought you some time in the sun. Just don't get used to it. I have yet to try you out other than in the safety of my own home. You're comfy and cute, but can you be taken out in public? I'm not sure yet if you aren't the fashion equivalent of a guy/girl who's good enough to sleep with, but who's too ugly to take out to dinner.

I'm sorry to hurt your feelings, Leggings. I hope this works out well for both of us. You'll get a chance to be walk among the living again and make amends for your past wrongs, rather than living in the annals of unfortunate fashion history, and I'll get a chance to feel somewhat fashion forward. But I swear to God, the minute I feel I'm getting a "she's trying too hard vibe" from even the mailman, you are being kicked right to the curb.

See you Saturday night. I have a thigh-length sweater I want you meet.

Sincerely,
MM

PS - Tell your friend the vest, despite our rekindled romance, she has absolutely NO shot.

Sunday, October 3, 2010

This IS my job

"What are you going to do now?"

I can not mention the fact that all three of my children are in school four mornings a week without being asked the question above. It seems the perception of modern stay-at-home mothers, is that we are all like horses at the starting gate, chomping at the bit, waiting for that school bell to ring, in order to get on with our real lives. And, to some degree, that is true. I have written, quite recently even, about the zen-like existence I pictured myself leading once my offspring were not in my care all of their waking hours.

Instead, what has happened, is the various minutiae involved when I now have not one, but two, school-aged children seems to have quadrupled, rather than doubled. My oldest was keenly aware of my new child-free hours and leaped on the opportunity to assail me with requests to be class mother, library volunteer, ice cream and pizza day helper, and like a sucker, I agreed. Number 2 has the dubious distinction of having me as her Girl Scout leader, and while last year I skated by doing crafts and talking about the great outdoors, this year I have to actually, you know, go outdoors - with nineteen six year-olds. This requires emails to nineteen different families, then collecting reams of ass-covering paperwork to protect the Girl Scouts of America from those same parents, some of whom, act like they're doing me a favor, forcing me to hunt them down at school drop-off for their forms, in order to take their Ugg-wearing whiner into the woods for the afternoon,

So the mornings I thought would be spent writing and getting this house decorated and organized, so far, have been spent filling out insurance disclaimers and attending training sessions to learn how to use the library's checkout system (my fantasy of finally being able to wield that rubber date stamp has been shattered), resulting in a very frustrated Mean Mommy. I was thinking to myself, "When do I get to get on with my life?" Then I had a thought.

This IS my life. So why am I pretending it's not?

What I mean by that is, as a stay-at-home mother, it seems you have to have a back-up plan, a What I Really Want to be Doing, in order to not feel like a total loser. There is no cultural support for being a mother "professionally", even though more and more of us are doing just that. The culturally accepted attitude for educated, capable women who are home with their children is one of thinly-veiled disdain for a choice they themselves have made. Books like The Three Martini Playdate, while hilarious, are so popular because it is simply not cool to like, or be fulfilled by, staying at home. It's like what being smart was in high school - privately desirable, but publicly ridiculed.

The idea of having a sideline, like my writing, is good, in theory. It has given me an outlet for my intellectual energy, because no matter how time-consuming parenting is, a brain teaser it is not. I wanted to maintain my reservoir of three syllable words, but it is also an added pressure. There have been many days when I am actively annoyed with my kids because they are keeping me from writing. But guess what? They didn't make the choice for me to be at home, I did. I chose raising them to be my full-time job, and writing is my side gig - not the other way around. I realized I make myself miserable some days ignoring that fact. I cringe writing that, knowing what a throw-back I sound like. And I'm not writing here AT ALL about the choice to stay at home or work. You know I think both are very valid options, but the question I raise is, why do so many of us make this choice then refuse to embrace it? This summer, when I gave myself three months to do just that, was incredible. Now that I'm back to being pulled in a thousand directions, I have that same tight chest, oh-God-I-really-wanted-to-rewrite-the-last-paragraph, feeling when one of the kids asks me to read to them after dinner and that is really kind of messed up.

I in no way intend to give up my writing, or become a helicopter mom, making my life entirely about my kids and their lives and losing my sense of self apart from that. Plus, I curse too much to spend that much time at the school and I do think, giving child-rearing too much thought can create problems for the child and the parent equally. What I do want to pursue is a mental shift. I don't want to beat myself up anymore because I've had exactly one piece published in the three years I've been writing this blog. I don't want to feel like what I spend the majority of my waking hours doing is not a valid choice in the eyes of society. Because I know it is. In short, I want to give myself a break. Do I expect H to work two jobs? Then how do I expect that of myself? When the time is truly right, I will take on more. Maybe that time is not right now, but so what? I want to express pride in what I do and stop qualifying my existence with future plans like a sophomore trying to transfer out of community school.

Yes, it will still sting at the company holiday party when one of the young people H works with asks me what I do and my answer, "I'm at home with my kids" earns me the sound of crickets chirping and poor H will chime in about my writing, which I am loathe to do since I feel it is akin to a guy working at TGIFridays telling you he's "really an actor". But I will enjoy, more than a little, the look of surprise, that a woman who is intelligent and funny and wearing sick shoes chooses to spend her days covered in peanut butter and tempera paint or helping the first graders pick out a library book. Maybe by not qualifying what I do to someone who has no idea what a job it actually is, will help to change that person's perceptions. Perhaps I need to find a new way of saying it.

"I'm a working mother", I think says it all.

Friday, October 1, 2010

No , I didn't forget how to spell

..or use punctuation, or structure a sentence. I love when Little Man just happens to hit a combination of keys that publish a post I'm working on before I can edit it. Apologies to those of you who got a poor preview of the last post.
I knows hw ta spel.

Turn a trick or treat!!!




It's that time of year again. Time for me to repeatedly use the word "inappropriate" as my oldest flips through the myriad of Halloween costume catalogues that are flooding my mailbox. I am tired already and it's the first day of October.

Why, one would ask, do I allow her to look through these catalogues, if it is an exercise in frustration? Well, we have been through the stable of princesses, and last year was Hannah Montana, so unless the almighty Disney gods, create a new character the wins my daughter over in the next three weeks, I have no choice but to try and give her some costume inspiration. Because sitting at the kitchen table saying, "What about a doctor? What about a cowgirl? What about A butterfly?", did nothing but give my youngest, who had chosen her costume in three minutes, more ideas and confuse her. And when she came up with the idea of being a bumble bee, I took one look at her in her glasses, saw her looking like the girl from the Blind Melon video after fat camp, and pictured every parent in my age bracket laughing their asses off. I had to do something to get that idea off the table immediately.

My oldest has reached a weird age in childhood. She is only eight, but she is as tall as a ten year-old, so just as with her clothing, her Halloween costume choices include some with a distinctly sexual vibe. Let's take the "Lacy Witch Child's Costume" pictured left. First of all, witches costume are supposed to be black- OK, maybe black and neon green or orange or red. But black and pink? Where else do you see this combination other than lingerie (OK, and poodle skirts, another costume idea that was rejected)? And with the lacy overlay, one can't help but think this is the kid's Victoria's Secret catalogue. Which I'm sure is coming since if Abercrombie can sell kid-sized thongs, Vicky's going to want in on that action. Adding to the boudoir vibe, is the corset-like bodice and the lace arm thingies. What the hell are those? Arm warmers? They could only be more awful if they extended down the top of the hand and had one loop for the middle finder to go through like those horrid fingerless wedding gloves. I cringe.

I also fail to understand how costume designers continue to create costumes that have no sleeves!!! Halloween costumes are for trick or treating, that, unless you live in Manhattan, usually takes place out of doors, in autumn. Sure, kids in California and Florida are psyched, but there is nothing more depressing as a child on Halloween, than having to wear a coat over your carefully selected disguise. And more to the point, if a little girl is dressed in spaghetti straps, other than in the dead of summer, she looks naked. How about just a cap sleeve? Come on!

Ok, the stockings. The last time I, myself, wore a pair of nylons was back in 1999. If grown women have decided that black hose are tacky, then why the hell is an eight year old wearing them? What's wrong with a nice pair of leg-obscuring, opaque tights? Or leggings? Or a hemline that reaches pass the bottom of your ass cheeks when you have to wear it to run around your neighborhood gathering peanut butter cups for your mother? I can't even begin to discuss the shoes. While I loves me some ridiculously high heels, I think, until you are able to drive yourself wherever you need to go while wearing them, they are verboten. And, again, you won't be getting me my tithe of chocolate any faster clip-clapping down the street on wobbly ankles.

This costume is not the only one of it's kind. This is from a pretty tame catalogue, that made it through my rigorous screening process - anything with slutty Dorothy, or slutty Alice in Wonderland went right in the trash. Why this need to over-sexualize our girls at such a young age? Sure, there are kids who are into this stuff, but let them cobble together their own slutwear. Must we pre-fab it for them and try to infect all the others? Why must sexuality be the only aspect of one's self to be let loose on Halloween? The above mentioned "slutty" costumes are quite the rage for the under thirty women if my younger Facebook friends are a decent sample (PS, no I don't want to be friends with you new babysitter, please keep photos of your tonguing your boyfriend to yourself). Why can't it be strength or our sense of humor?

So the costume pictured right is what we wound up with. Now, hold your horses, I see it has no sleeves, but when she volunteered to wear a t-shirt underneath, I knew how much she loved the fact that the skirt lit up (ridiculous, I know). So her wonderful grandmother will be custom making her a black bolero jacket with some kind of crazy-amazing fringe, like sequins or feathers. And notice the leggings and flat shoes. She will also not be wearing those ridiculous hair extensions, which look like deranged peyos.

My kids, they have no idea how good they have it, complaining about which costumes I allow them to get. I'd be psyched ot have even the worst of these ready-made, fabric costumes, no matter how lame. Nothing will erase the memory of wearing those bad, plastic, drug-store costumes as a child, which were really just giant plastic sacks and a mask that made your face sweat. So while I am sad, not one of my daughters took me up on the suggestion of Wonder Woman, for whom I would have lifted my no-bare-shoulders ban, at least neither of them will look like mini-hookers. And, as my youngest pointed out excitedly, "Mommy!! LOOK! The Wonder Woman costume comes in adult sizes."
Now that's an idea.